Some say that the Bible is a good book, but it should not be taken literally; you must not insist that it is entirely trustworthy and authoritative because some parts of the Bible are wrong, historically unreliable or culturally regressive.

The four Gospels contain very specific details because they were written by eyewitness who had direct access to accurate historical information.  The strength of these eyewitnesses only grows when we study the archaeological and historical support that validates much of the Old Testament.  How does the eyewitness angle strengthen your belief in Scripture?